[ Japanese ]

Measures Against Environmental Pollution Caused by Chemical Substances, etc.

Governance

Implementation Framework

With regard to chemical substances used by relevant departments and subject to pollution prevention measures, the Environmental Subcommittee confirms their usefulness and risks and when necessary, instructs improvements, thereby ensuring proper monitoring and supervision of their use.

Strategy

Preventing pollution from chemical substances

Throughout the lifecycle of our homes, we strive to minimize risks of chemical substance use through proper EVABAT (Economically Viable Application of Best Available Technology) procedures to prevent and stop pollution in excess of legal regulations. We formulated our Chemical Substance Guidelines in 2007 as a standard for managing chemical substances and have enforced this management system of chemical substances ever since. However, in August 2024, we transitioned to a more robust framework by aligning each phase of the product lifecycle with departmental procedures and integrating these with internal rules (such as product design reviews) and the content of the aforementioned Chemical Substance Guidelines. Following this integration, the Chemical Substance Guidelines were discontinued in the same month.

Responsible Divisions, Preventive Procedures, and Risks Addressed at Each Lifecycle Phase

Lifecycle phase Division Design and
Development
Divisions
Production
Divisions
Construction
Divisions
Design and Development Divisions
Preventive
procedures
Risks
addressed
Environmental
design
ISO-based
standards/
procedures for
environmental
management, etc.
Construction
management
standards/
procedures
Environmental
design that has
minimal impact
on residents
Providing
information on the
use of hazardous
substances in
products
1 Product design
and development
Impact across product lifecycles        
2 Production at
suppliers
Risk of supplier employees being exposed to substances during production

Risk of environmental contamination during production
       
3 Production at
Company factories
Risk of employees being exposed to substances during production

Risk of environmental contamination during production
     
4 Construction Risk of employees being exposed to substances when handling components

Risk of environmental contamination due to improper disposal of construction waste
     
5 Residence Risks to residents from insufficient environmental design      
6 Product disposal Risk of employees being exposed to substances during demolition

Risk of environmental contamination due to improper disposal of waste
     

Order of considerations

Level Areas of focus Relevant examples Operational standards (criteria)
1 Chemical substances prohibited from use under Japanese law Asbestos: Subject to the Act on Asbestos Health Damage Prevention and other regulations

Ozone-depleting substances: Designated substances under the Act on the Protection of the Ozone Layer

Class 1 specified chemical substances under the Act on the Regulation of Manufacture and Evaluation of Chemical Substances
Use is prohibited, and products containing these substances are not adopted.
2 Chemical substances subject to management
system reviews from a risk management perspective, with actions taken as necessary to
reduce usage or switch to alternatives
Hazardous substances subject to risk assessment under Article 57 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare)

Substances causing sick building syndrome and similar conditions (with guideline values set by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare)

Class 2 specified substances under the Soil Contamination Countermeasures Act (Ministry of the Environment)
Adoption of products containing these substances requires confirmation to ensure proper
prevention of contamination. Consideration may also be given to switching to alternative substances or reducing usage, while accounting
for performance and cost.
3 Chemical substances regulated by Japanese
environment-related laws, excluding those
listed above
Substances specified by and subject to the PRTR Law (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry)

Substances specified by Cabinet Order under the Poisonous and Deleterious Substances Control Act (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare)
Ensure compliance with applicable regulations, track usage, and conduct required reporting and public disclosure.

Note: This section defines pollution as a state in which ecosystems or human health are adversely affected because of insufficient preventive actions.

Policy for proper disposal of hazardous waste

The hazardous waste this report refers to is waste generated during operations, which, according to the Wastes Disposal and Public Cleansing Act, the Group regulates as specially controlled industrial waste (including specific types of hazardous waste regulated in the Basel Convention, etc.). All types of hazardous waste are properly handled throughout storage, transport, and disposal based on legal, governmental, and industry guidelines.
  Hazardous waste mainly originates from building materials used in construction and demolition (including restorations) and leftover chemical substances produced as byproducts in material manufacturing. For building materials used in the above-mentioned operations, this may include asbestos in heat-retaining, thermal insulation, and fire-resistant coating materials, slag, sludge above base amounts, and other hazardous waste connected to construction work that may be generated depending on site conditions.
  As a rule, hazardous waste is disposed of in controlled landfills which have measures to prevent leakage into the natural environment. Leftover chemical substances produced as factory byproducts of material manufacturing are, with regard to their various characteristics and properties, recycled in their entirety through processes such as neutralization, reduction treatment, and thermal recovery conducted through incineration.
  Because hazardous waste generated by factories presents a large potential environmental impact, procedures have been established by these factories to prevent and mitigate pollution in emergencies such as accidents, earthquakes, and other disasters. Through repeatedly conducting appropriate tests, they are working to ensure there are zero emissions to the natural environment even during emergencies.

Risk Management

Addressing risks of contamination by hazardous chemicals

In addressing risks of contamination by hazardous chemicals, it is essential to always strive to balance corporate activities with preventive measures by such means as setting management levels according to the risks of using the chemical substances in products. We set a variety of standards and procedures for handling our products at each lifecycle phase.

Addressing risks related to soil and groundwater pollution

We work to minimize risks, including the prevention of secondary pollution, by conducting surveys and implementing countermeasures not only for the land of Company facilities, but also for land we have engaged in transactions. Prior to engaging in land purchase or sales contracts, we identify risks related to soil and groundwater contamination by means of a pre-screening system using our own soil contamination checklist (including a survey of historical land use; surveys of topography, geology, and groundwater; a data survey on surrounding environmental measurements by local governments; a site inspection survey; and legal compliance check).
  In the case of land that may contain contaminated soil, such as former factory sites, sellers are increasingly conducting their own voluntary surveys. When purchasing land, a specialized department of the Company scrutinizes all such survey reports. If a problem is identified regarding the completeness of the information, we ask the seller to conduct additional surveys.
  Properties that are determined to be at risk of contamination are analyzed by designated research institutions to evaluate the appropriateness of the transaction. Where soil contamination has been discovered as a result of the investigation, land with minor concentrations and distributions of contamination (land contaminated mainly with heavy metals where complete remediation can be guaranteed) undergoes remediation by soil replacement before the sale. In such cases, we explain the measures that have been taken as a material matter. Land with more serious contamination is not purchased.
 At domestic factories on our own sites where contamination could be a risk if no action is taken, we have set up measures and procedures for investigation, prevention, ongoing management, and emergency response (prevention and mitigation of contamination), and are implementing contamination risk management.

Initiatives for proper processing of hazardous waste

Approximately 95% of the hazardous waste that we handle is asbestos (Levels 1 and 2) from existing structures, which is strictly treated as specially controlled industrial waste. The remainder is mainly residual substances left over from the use of chemical raw materials handled in domestic production facilities.
  For specially controlled industrial waste generated at domestic factories, we comply with the Wastes Disposal and Public Cleansing Act, as well as all related laws and regulations (such as the Ordinance on Prevention of Hazards due to Specified Chemical Substances) and industry guidelines. Procedures are also in place to identify potential accidents and emergencies that could lead to significant environmental impact, to prevent any adverse environmental impact, and to conduct mitigation to minimize the escalation of impact. At the same time, the effectiveness of emergency preparedness and response procedures is maintained through annual testing and internal audits.

Metrics and Targets

Atmospheric and other external emissions of chemical substances from factory production

  Boundary Targets FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025
Substances subject to the PRTR Law*1
Sekisui House, Ltd.
  • Continue appropriate protective measures
  • Maintain zero accidents caused by chemical substances
No accidents caused by chemicals used in factory production occurred. Same Same Same
Atmospheric emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)*2 60% decrease from FY2010 levels 87%
decrease
87%
decrease
89% decrease
  Boundary Unit FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025
Emissions and transfer of PRTR-listed substances*3
Sekisui
House, Ltd.
t 48 59 55
VOCs subject to PRTR Law*3 20.0 18 11.5
VOCs not subject to PRTR Law*3 42.9 43.8 43.9
Sulfur oxides (SOx) Emissions 0.052 0.047 0.052 0.083
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Emissions 3.37 3.17 2.72 6.02

*1 Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Law: Law requiring the monitoring of environmental emissions of specified chemical substances and promotion of improved management. Businesses meeting certain conditions specified by Cabinet Order are required to report the amount of specified chemical substances released and disposed of annually.
*2 Sekisui House Group confirms and monitors emissions of the 80 VOCs for which atmospheric emissions require monitoring designated under the Japan Pre-fabricated Construction Suppliers and Manufacturers Association’s Eco Action 2020 management survey.
*3 Because they are taken from a government report, the figures here are for the period from April 2023 to March 2024, which differs from the period covered by this document.

Initiatives for Processing Hazardous Waste and Preventing Contamination by Chemical Substances

  Targets FY2023 FY2024 FY2025
During factory production
  • Maintain zero release of hazardous waste into the natural environment
No improper processing or scattering accidents. Same Same
During construction
  • Continue appropriate protective measures
  • Maintain zero accidents caused by chemical substances
No accidents caused by use of chemical substances occurred. Same Same
Natural environment (soil)
  • Maintain zero serious risk when purchasing land*4
No purchases (sales) occurred involving
contaminated land exceeding legal standards or unremediated land.
Same Same
Construction waste
  • Maintain zero release of hazardous waste into the environment during new construction
No release accidents occurred. Same Same
During demolition and disposal
  • Maintain zero emissions of hazardous waste into the environment during demolition work
No environmental release accidents occurred. Same Same

*4 Serious risk includes redevelopment of brownfield sites (land that is idle due to real or potential contamination caused by industrial activities, etc.)

Pollution, waste, and resource use costs (including shadow costs) and investment in R&D on reducing or avoiding their impacts

The Resource Recycling Centers at our factories handle waste from construction sites, sorting plastic products for recycling, and collecting metals and other valuables. In FY2025, the costs arising from waste-related issues—including external economic costs—associated with operations ranging from collection point management to the operation of resource circulation centers totaled ¥1,702 million.
  In addition, Group company Konoike Construction invested ¥105 million for experimental research aimed at developing technologies for processing organic fluorine and automation technologies for the demolishing of facilities and equipment.

Other Initiatives

Evidence of urban brownfield redevelopment

Risk assessments of all properties based on a soil contamination checklist in accordance with Company standards are conducted when purchasing real estate. Should soil contamination risks be discovered, we consult with a specialized department, survey the soil and implement contamination countermeasures before selling the property to the customer. MiraMachi, a 27-hectare former factory site in Toyohashi City, Aichi Prefecture, is being developed as a mixed-use project that aims to solve local issues and realize a compact city. In addition, for the redevelopment of former factory sites and similar sites, Group company Konoike Construction draws on its wealth of experience and technologies to plan and propose optimal countermeasures to implement them based on surveying results, for dealing with soil contamination, including that caused by leaks of hazardous substances, heavy metals, and volatile organic compounds. For example, on a former factory site where soil contamination from mercury was identified, we installed a temporary on-site soil washing facility and conducted operations to clean the contaminated soil. Soil washing generally involves the use of water. However, as removing mercury that is firmly adsorbed onto minute soil particles is difficult with water washing alone, a dedicated solvent is used to separate and remove the mercury from soil particles. In a single day, 150 ㎥ of contaminated soil can be treated, resulting in an average of 3,000 ㎥ being treated a month.